Accreditation - Teacher Education Unit ReviewMichigan Technological University
|
| Faculty Member | Degree | Institution | Specialty |
| Susan Amato-Henderson | Ph.D. | University of North Dakota | Experimental Psychology |
| Brad Baltensperger | Ph.D. | Clark University | Geography |
| Kedmon Hungwe | Ph.D. | Michigan State University | Educational Psychology |
| Rosalie P. Kern | Ph.D. | Central Michigan University | Applied Experimental Psychology |
| William L. Yarroch | Ph.D. | University of Wisconsin-Madison | Curriculum & Instruction, Science Education |
Table II. Part-Time Faculty and Lecturer/Supervisors Terminal Degrees
| Faculty Member | Degree | Institution | Specialty |
| Christina Cho | Ph.D. | University of Chicago | Human Development |
| Theodore Holmstrom | M.S. | Northern Illinois University | Secondary Education |
| Evelyn Johnson | M.A. | Michigan Technological University | English Education Instructional Methods |
| Gerald Parker | M.S. | New Mexico Highlands University | Natural Sciences |
| John Uren | M.A. | Northern Michigan University | Mathematics Education |
| Terry Wuorinen | M.A. | Suomi College | Secondary Education |
B. What strategies are used to ensure that teacher education faculty receives professional development that is relevant to the preparation of teachers for P-12 education?
The Education Department budget allocates $1100 in travel funds annually per faculty member for department faculty to attend conferences related to their professional specialization and to P-12 education. In recent years faculty have attended and participated in conferences sponsored by the Wisconsin Society of Science Teachers, Michigan Science Teachers Association, Michigan Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Michigan Earth Science Teachers Association, National Science Teachers Association (Regional and National), American Educational Research Association, and American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, as well as a national conference on Service Learning.
C. What strategies are used to ensure that teacher education faculty model best teaching practices?
Teacher education faculty and university supervisors are encouraged to engage in relevant professional development. For tenure-track faculty, this is essential for eventual promotion and tenure. Participation in regional and national conferences related to instruction is detailed above in B. The department chair observes the teaching performance of untenured faculty on an annual basis and uses those observations as part of the mandated annual review of faculty performance. The university also uses a standard teaching evaluation process.
The university operates a Center for Teaching, Learning, and Faculty Development (the director of which is an adjunct faculty member in the Department of Education. The center provides services to all university faculty to assist them in improving their instructional skills. The center also administers the student evaluation of instruction process at the university. Each faculty member must be evaluated by students in all classes taught. The administration utilizes the results of these evaluations as part of its merit review process.
In addition, faculty regularly participate in workshops sponsored by the Center for Teaching, Learning, and Faculty Development workshops. In previous years, Department of Education faculty have made presentations in the workshop series. In the current academic year the following workshops have been offered:
9/2003 Teaching at Tech: Honoring the Trust: quality and Cost Containment in Higher Education. Colleges and universities must improve the efficiency and quality of their educational delivery systems to remain affordable and to confront increasing challenges from alternative providers.
10/2003 Teaching at Tech: Supplemental Instruction. Supplemental instruction uses advanced undergraduate students to provide scheduled workshops tightly coordinated with a specific academic course.
12/2003 Teaching at Tech: Concept Tests: A Pathway to Interactive Classrooms. Faculty members have found that employing these simple interactive teaching techniques has resulted in improved student performance, retention, and student satisfaction.
1/2004 Teaching at Tech: Learning from Enterprise. Faculty members and students working with some of the Enterprise projects will discuss the impact these projects are having on their teaching and learning.
2/2004 Teaching at Tech: Learner-Centered Teaching: The Balance of Power. In this workshop we will explore how instructors are using power sharing to increase student enthusiasm and engagement.
3/2004 Teaching at Tech: Learning and Unlearning. Many instructors may be overlooking the effects of prior conceptions on student learning. In this workshop we will evaluate the effects of prior conceptions on teaching and learning and outline some remedies.
D. To what extent are teacher education faculty actively involved with teachers and other P-12 educational personnel?
The Education Department at Michigan Tech is a small operation in a small community. The education faculty, student teacher supervisors, and the department chair are embedded in the community and are thoroughly familiar with local educators and school districts. The department chair has served on a local school board for 16 years, one faculty member serves on another local school board, and two supervisors are lifelong residents. We are on a first-name basis with most administrators and many teachers in local schools, which facilitates communication and interaction in support of prospective teachers going through the Education program.
The Department receives advice and recommendations from its Advisory Council, comprised of area teachers, principals and superintendents. The Advisory Council meets twice annually to discuss issues relating to student teaching, quality of teacher candidates, departmental programs and programmatic changes, and other matters of mutual concern (see sample agendas and minutes of Advisory Council meetings).
E. What strategies are used to ensure that teacher education faculty model the use of technology as a tool for teaching and learning? Provide evidence of this use.
Professional Development and Expertise. Faculty regularly participate in regional and national conferences related to instruction (see B above). Two of the faculty specialize in instructional technology and have taught the required course in that area, ED3100, as well as online graduate-level courses in science education.
Appropriate Tools. All education faculty have recent model desktop and/or laptop computers, which are supported by the university’s System Administration Services. The department has the ability to produce and edit digital video on CD and DVD.
Appropriate Classroom. The Education Department classroom, where most of the education classes are taught, has been remodeled from a 1950s-style science teaching laboratory and is now equipped with some of the latest technology for classroom use. This includes 2 computers, LCD projector, white boards, DVD and VHS video, VHS and digital camcorders, digital cameras, video visualizer, and a SmartBoard. A Polycom Viewstation will be added in the near future.
Plans are currently in the works to further equip the classroom with portable, wireless computers that can be used by students during lessons.
Actual Use Examples. All education faculty are well versed in the use of technology for instruction. Examples that occur in the classes include:
PowerPoint/Keynote based presentations. (ED3100,
ED3110, ED3210, ED4700, ED4710)
Video production to support class projects (ED3210, ED2100/3100)
Student presentations using technology (ED3210, ED2100/3100, ED4700, ED4710)
Group editing of documents using a projected image (ED3210)
Videotaping of student presentations (ED3210, ED4700, ED4710)
Electronic submission and grading of assignments (ED3210, ED3100, ED4710)
Regular consultation with area educational technology specialists, teachers and the department's advisory board provides feedback on trends in the uses of technology in the classroom.
F. What strategies are used to ensure that teacher education utilizes a variety of assessment strategies and technologies to assess teacher candidate performance and to support continuous improvement? Provide evidence of this utilization.
Strategies. The Education Department has an Assessment Plan, overseen by an assessment committee, which is a component of the university’s Assessment Plan. The Department’s plan identifies a set of strategies for assessing student learning, as well as for evaluating the unit’s ability to provide a quality program for pre-service teachers.
Evidence from individual courses:
Project assessment (ED3210, ED4710, ED/SS4020,
ED/HU4140)
Group project presentation (ED3210, ED4710, ED/HU4140)
Concept map assessment (ED4710)
Authentic Performance assessment (ED4710)
Portfolio assessment (ED3100 [formerly
ED2100], ED/HU4140, ED4710,
student teaching application,
certification completion)
Electronic portfolios (see
for example ED3100)
Oral presentation assessment (ED4700, ED4710)
Interview assessment (ED3100)
Journals (ED3210, ED4710, ED/HU4140, ED/HU4150, ED4910)
Electronic publishing (newsletters, web pages) (ED3100, ED3210)
Student teachers are evaluated
on their assessment and technology skills through regular observation by
supervisors, support
and advice from cooperating teachers, as well as formal evaluations (see
student teaching evaluation forms).
Student
Teaching Mid-Semester Evaluation and Grade Report
Student Teaching Final Evaluation
and Grade Report
Student Teaching Snapshot Evaluation
![]()
